// COMPARE

Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Total War: WARHAMMER

AAHEAD
2016 · RPG

Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest

—
Not rated yet
B
2016 · RPG

Total War: WARHAMMER

—
Not rated yet
// VERDICT

Critics favour Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest, 87 to 86.

Metacritic · not enough ratings here yet

⇄ Swap
// SCORES

Who rates higher.

87Metacritic86
// RIGHT_NOW

Who is playing and watching.

—Playing on Steam310

Steam counts only Steam; Twitch only Twitch. Live, refreshed every minute.

// TIME_TO_BEAT

How long they take.

30 hNormal—

From IGDB.com · View Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest on IGDB.com · View Total War: WARHAMMER on IGDB.com

// DETAILS

What they are.

2016-02-19Released2016-05-24
Intelligent SystemsDeveloperFeral Interactive, Creative Assembly
NintendoPublisherSEGA, Feral Interactive
RPGStrategyGenresRPGStrategy
Nintendo 3DSPlatformsPCmacOSLinux
—Avg playtime9 h

2 genres in common — shown in orange.

// NEXT_MATCHUP

Keep the argument going.

VSFire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Fire Emblem Fates: BirthrightVSFire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Utawarerumono: Mask of TruthVSFire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Fire Emblem: Three HousesVSTotal War: WARHAMMER vs Total War: THREE KINGDOMSVSTotal War: WARHAMMER vs Total War: WARHAMMER IIVSTotal War: WARHAMMER vs Total War: WARHAMMER III
From IGDB.com · View Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest on IGDB.com · View Total War: WARHAMMER on IGDB.com