// COMPARE

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) vs Diablo III: Eternal Collection

AAHEAD
1998 · Action

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998)

—
Not rated yet
B
2017 · Action

Diablo III: Eternal Collection

—
Not rated yet
// VERDICT

Critics favour The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998), 99 to 88.

Metacritic · not enough ratings here yet

⇄ Swap
// SCORES

Who rates higher.

99Metacritic88
// RIGHT_NOW

Who is playing and watching.

1.6KWatching on Twitch—

Steam counts only Steam; Twitch only Twitch. Live, refreshed every minute.

// TIME_TO_BEAT

How long they take.

8.5 hRushed—
31 hNormal—
46 hCompletionist—

From IGDB.com · View The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) on IGDB.com

// DETAILS

What they are.

1998-11-21Released2017-06-27
NintendoDeveloper—
NintendoPublisherBlizzard Entertainment
ActionAdventureRPGGenresAction
Nintendo SwitchNintendo 64PlatformsNintendo SwitchPlayStation 4Xbox One
7 hAvg playtime—

1 genre in common · 1 platform in common — shown in orange.

// NEXT_MATCHUP

Keep the argument going.

VSThe Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) vs The Legend of Zelda: Twilight PrincessVSThe Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) vs The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the PastVSThe Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) vs The Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap
From IGDB.com · View The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) on IGDB.com