// COMPARE

Total War: WARHAMMER vs Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest

A
2016 · RPG

Total War: WARHAMMER

—
Not rated yet
BAHEAD
2016 · RPG

Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest

—
Not rated yet
// VERDICT

Critics favour Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest, 87 to 86.

Metacritic · not enough ratings here yet

⇄ Swap
// SCORES

Who rates higher.

86Metacritic87
// RIGHT_NOW

Who is playing and watching.

296Playing on Steam—

Steam counts only Steam; Twitch only Twitch. Live, refreshed every minute.

// TIME_TO_BEAT

How long they take.

—Normal30 h

From IGDB.com · View Total War: WARHAMMER on IGDB.com · View Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest on IGDB.com

// DETAILS

What they are.

2016-05-24Released2016-02-19
Feral Interactive, Creative AssemblyDeveloperIntelligent Systems
SEGA, Feral InteractivePublisherNintendo
RPGStrategyGenresRPGStrategy
PCmacOSLinuxPlatformsNintendo 3DS
9 hAvg playtime—

2 genres in common — shown in orange.

// NEXT_MATCHUP

Keep the argument going.

VSTotal War: WARHAMMER vs Total War: THREE KINGDOMSVSTotal War: WARHAMMER vs Total War: WARHAMMER IIVSTotal War: WARHAMMER vs Total War: WARHAMMER IIIVSFire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Fire Emblem Fates: BirthrightVSFire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Utawarerumono: Mask of TruthVSFire Emblem Fates: Conquest vs Fire Emblem: Three Houses
From IGDB.com · View Total War: WARHAMMER on IGDB.com · View Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest on IGDB.com